By Andrei Skvarsky.

Ernst & Young has hired Martin Steinbach, a former senior figure at Deutsche Boerse, to run its initial public offerings and listings centre for Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa.

Steinbach spent nearly a decade as head of issuer and investor markets at Deutsche Boerse, the stock exchange based in Frankfurt-am-Main, before joining Ernst & Young, one of the world’s “Big Four” audit firms.

His experience includes deals in China, Russia, the CIS and India. He is the author of books and articles and a frequent speaker at international seminars, Ernst & Young said in a statement.

Jim O'Neill - Goldman Sachs Asset Management

 By Jim O’Neill, Chairman, Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

Western sovereign debt issues rolled on again last week, with fierce competition between the US and the Euro Area for attention. As President Obama and Congress struggle to reach a budget compromise ahead of the debt ceiling deadline, two ratingagencies made it clear that failure to make progress would result in a loss of the US’s precious triple A rating. Meanwhile, Europe’s leaders told us at the start of the week that they would soon have a new proposal to deal with their sovereign challenges and we await its detail. We did get the results of the latest European bank stress tests late Friday, about which I would imagine many will say, “Why did they bother?”

The Dollar and the Euro are the most widely traded and investable currencies in terms of liquidity, but would you put your close family and friends into either for the next few years and beyond?

What if anyone could be in the EMU?

On returning fromTokyothree weeks ago, I mentioned that I joked during the trip that a new European Monetary Union (EMU) could be created that would include onlyFinlandand the “Growth Economies.” I am reminded of this again this week. Imagine an odd world where the only requirement for EMU membership was the actualMaastrichtcriteria on budget deficits and government debt (as opposed, perhaps, to just geographical location!). To join the EMU, in theory, countries were supposed to have budget deficits of 3pct of GDP or less, and embark on policies that would lower the level of debt to 60pct of GDP or below. While many countries managed to creep into the system, as you can see in the attached slide titled “Budget Deficits and

Government Debt,”Finlandis the only EMU member that currently satisfies these criteria.AustriaandGermanyare not far off. Due to the high level of debt in most Club Med countries, the average debt and deficit percentages for the Euro Area overall indicate that the EMU is not functioning by its own rules. If you think the situation is bad in the Euro Area, you will note that it is much worse in the other G7 countries (with the possible exception ofCanada). The fiscal and debt positions ofJapanand theUSare notably weaker, and theUK’s situation is no better, than the Euro Area average.

The next slide in this file shows the deficit and debt positions of the Growth Economies (as we call them at GSAM). I would like to remind you that these are the economies that many of you still call “Emerging.” Six of these countries easily satisfy theMaastrichtcriteria for deficit and debt responsibility. The debt levels of the other two countries,IndiaandRussia, are considerably better than those of the entire developed world except, perhaps, forFinland.

So you could combine all eight of the Growth Economies with the best four countries in the so-called “advanced world” *Finland,Austria,CanadaandGermany* and end up with a really assorted bunch to assemble into a sound monetary union. They are not shown in the table, but  to anticipate some putting me right, you could throw in Australia, Sweden and of course, Switzerland too. Each of these three would fulfill the criteria too. Setting aside their separated geographies, there is little else to justify such a union other than theMaastrichtcriteria. They aren’t necessarily natural trading partners. But mind you, this may change. Trade patterns are evolving dramatically as the BRIC countries become more and more important to the global economy.  EMU members are not trading as much with each other today as was the case before the conception of the union in 1999. By the end of this year,Germanywill probably export more toChinathan any other country apart fromFranceand theUS. Short of a major slowdown inChina,Germanywill rise to number one soon thereafter.

Changing patterns of global financial flows.

Against this background, it is hardly surprising that everywhere I go I find many investors intensely debating the need for more appropriate benchmarks and fresh approaches to asset allocation. When you consider that the Growth Eight are likely to contribute around twice as much to global GDP growth this decade as theUSand the Euro Area combined, the only real question is why all investors are not engaged in this debate. The other attachment is a chart that shows what the Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research group is assuming in terms of US$ nominal GDP changes this decade. It is pretty straightforward.

So I find myself this weekend, asking the following questions again:

1.     Why do people persist in calling these fiscally sound drivers of world growth “emerging markets?”

2.     Why do we all derive the risk-free rate from the G7 world’s bond markets?

3.     Why are so many people still benchmarked to such out-of-date things as the MSCI?

Amongst the possible answers to all three questions is that the current fiscal and debt positions of all the countries discussed are simply aberrations that emerged over the past decade or so, and the future might be nothing like the past. This is, of course, distinctly possible. It also might be that many of the Growth Eight will somehow stop growing so strongly. And it could also be true thatJapan, all of Club Med, theUKand theUSare going to solve their structural fiscal challenges and grow sharply.  It is also true thatManchesterCitycould one day becomeEngland’s most successful football team!

By Andrei Skvarsky.

Citigroup, the world’s biggest financial services company, has promoted Adrian Faure to head of equities for Asia excluding Japan and Brent Robinson to head of research for the region as part of an overhaul of its global equities trading team.

Faure, who will be based in Hong Kong, was chief researcher for the region and Robinson his deputy prior to their new appointments.

Bloomberg cited Faure as saying Citi would focus on China, Russia, Brazil, South Africa and India in its emerging markets business.

London-based business daily City A.M. said Andy Thompson has become Citi’s head of equities for Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA).

This product is based on the performance of the S&P BRIC 40 Index, and will replace the current Global SMGIC indices, HSBC said. The fund, which is managed by HSBC Global Asset Management, has $115,000 in client money. The fund will have its

By Marcus Williams.

Russia's biggest bank Sberbank intends to open a new branch in India's New Delhi before the end of the year, its chief executive German Gref told the Indian Press.

Gref said the office would spend two years researching the vastly untapped Indian market looking for unoccupied niches. The bank filed a request with India's Central Bank in December last year to open up a rep office.

Sberbank is following in the footsteps of VTB, Russia's second-largest bank, which opened in Delhi back in 2008. VTB said the operation is targeting Indian companies with Russian capital and Indian companies working in Russia and the CIS.